Middle East Observer
بحث
AR

Amal Movement

Amal is a Lebanese Shia political movement and former civil war militia founded by Musa al-Sadr in the 1970s. Led by parliamentary speaker Nabih Berri, it has retained a separate organization while cooperating politically and militarily with Hezbollah.

آخر مراجعة: 15 نوفمبر 2026قراءة في 8 دقيقةالمراجع · 16

هذه المادة غير متوفرة بعد بلغتك، وتُعرض باللغة الإنجليزية.

Overview

The Amal Movement is a Shia political movement in Lebanon. Founded by cleric Musa al-Sadr in the 1970s, it developed an armed wing and became a major participant in the Lebanese Civil War. Under Nabih Berri, Amal moved into parliamentary politics while retaining an armed presence. Berri became speaker of Lebanon’s parliament, placing Amal’s leader at the center of the country’s governing system.

Amal’s history is tied to Syria’s influence in Lebanon and to its changing relationship with Hezbollah, a terrorist organization. The two are separate Shia organizations. Iran’s ruling regime helped build Hezbollah as an alternative to Syrian-aligned Amal in 1982; Amal members, including Hassan Nasrallah, defected to the new movement. After years of rivalry and fighting, Amal and Hezbollah formed an electoral alliance, shared influence in Lebanese governments and fought alongside each other against Israel.

Founding and ideology

Musa al-Sadr organized Lebanon’s Shia community during the 1970s, when its political representation and access to public resources were central concerns. Amal emerged from his effort to give that community an organized political voice and means of defense. The movement combined religious community leadership with Lebanese political demands. It did not adopt the Iranian revolutionary model that later shaped Hezbollah.

Al-Sadr’s approach also reflected divisions within Lebanon as civil war began. He believed the Lebanese National Movement, led by Kamal Jumblatt, had used Shia communities in its fight against Christian factions. Amal developed its own armed and political position amid that conflict. Al-Sadr’s disappearance in Libya in 1978 deprived the movement of its founder but did not end its growth.

Iran’s 1979 revolution sharpened Amal’s ideological divide with followers of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. Amal refused strict political and religious obedience to Khomeini. Iran’s ruling regime sought a Lebanese Shia organization more closely aligned with his authority and revolutionary program. That effort helped produce Islamic Amal and, subsequently, Hezbollah. Amal remained a distinct Lebanese movement, with its own leadership and institutions.

History

During the Lebanese Civil War, Amal operated as both a militia and a political organization. Its fighters became involved in struggles over Beirut, southern Lebanon and refugee camps. Syrian support made Amal an important part of Damascus’s influence in Lebanon. By 1982, Amal functioned as a Syrian proxy, a position that put it at odds with Iran’s effort to establish a competing Shia armed movement.

The split followed Israel’s 1982 operation in Lebanon. Nasrallah had become active in Amal as a teenager, rejoined it in 1980 and held responsibility for the Beqaa area on its behalf. He opposed the movement’s increasingly secular direction. Shortly after the 1982 operation, he and other Amal members left, taking followers into the emerging Hezbollah organization. Nasrallah became one of Hezbollah’s early founders. Amal continued under separate leadership as the two movements competed for Shia support.

Iran deployed Revolutionary Guard and regular army personnel to the Lebanon–Syria border in 1982. Although the mission was presented as a response to Israel’s operation, it was also intended to counter Syrian-aligned Amal by establishing Islamic Amal. Davoud Karimi, an Iranian revolutionary who had received training from Amal, was selected to lead the Revolutionary Guard mission before refusing the assignment. Iran’s intervention gave Hezbollah a base from which to challenge Amal’s position.

Competition between Amal and Hezbollah turned into armed rivalry during the later civil war years. From 1985 to 1990, the organizations fought for influence within Lebanon’s Shia community. Nasrallah fought both Israeli forces and his former Amal comrades while serving in Hezbollah’s ranks in the late 1980s. Their later alliance followed this period of direct conflict; it did not merge their organizations.

Amal also fought in the 1985–87 War of the Camps. Syrian-backed Amal forces attacked refugee camps and destroyed most of Fatah’s military presence there. From 1985 to 1988, attacks by Syrian-aligned Amal militiamen killed hundreds of Arab civilians in the camps. These operations were among Amal’s most consequential roles in the civil war and left a record extending beyond its rivalry with Hezbollah.

After the war, Berri became a central political supporter of Syrian hegemony in Lebanon. Amal and Hezbollah joined pro-Syrian forces in a Beirut demonstration of thousands in late November 2004, as opposition to Syria’s presence intensified. Syrian troops withdrew in 2005, but Amal’s alliance with Hezbollah endured. Lebanon’s electoral districts allowed both movements to retain large blocs in the 128-seat parliament. Their joint alliance won all 23 parliamentary seats in southern Lebanon in the 2005 election, and both received important portfolios in Fouad Siniora’s government. Berri was reelected speaker.

The governing compromise between Amal and Hezbollah on one side and the Hariri–Jumblatt camp on the other soon fractured. In December 2005, Amal and Hezbollah ministers suspended participation in cabinet meetings during discussion of an international tribunal. Their political camp favored continued armed struggle against Israel. By the 2009 parliamentary election, Amal and Hezbollah were part of the March 8 alliance alongside Michel Aoun’s Free Patriotic Movement. During Aoun’s presidency, his party belonged to a 72-member March 8 parliamentary coalition with them; Hezbollah and Amal had shifted their votes toward Aoun when he secured the presidency on a second ballot. After the 2018 election, the Progressive Socialist Party was counted in the largest parliamentary bloc alongside Hezbollah, Amal and Aoun’s party.

Structure and leadership

Nabih Berri has led Amal since the civil war era and serves as speaker of Lebanon’s parliament. Those roles give him influence over legislative business, coalition negotiations and the allocation of government posts. Amal’s leadership remains separate from Hezbollah’s even when the two organizations run joint lists or take the same position in cabinet. Berri’s position has made him a key intermediary in Lebanese political bargains, including those concerning Hezbollah’s role in state institutions.

Amal has maintained political, armed and social structures. It controls a Shia private-school system in Lebanon. The Anti-Defamation League has documented extreme antisemitism propagated by Berri while distinguishing Amal’s schools from the Hezbollah schools examined in its report. Amal’s influence also reaches municipal government. In Shia areas including Baalbek, it and Hezbollah contested municipal elections through a joint “Development and Loyalty” list. Their list won a sweeping majority of municipalities; in a significant portion of Baalbek Governorate, councils faced no opposing candidates and therefore no vote took place.

Amal’s influence has drawn criticism within Lebanon’s Shia community. In 2023, cleric Sheikh Yasser Aoudeh publicly criticized both Amal and Hezbollah and accused them of prohibiting criticism. His remarks followed a directive by a Shia religious body that declared him and other clerics unqualified to provide religious guidance. The Higher Islamic Shia Council subsequently said the directive did not reflect its position.

Funding and sponsors

Syria was Amal’s principal external sponsor during the civil war and supported its armed role in Lebanon. Damascus’s backing helped Amal compete with rival factions and later sustain political influence. Iran’s ruling regime initially pursued a different course: it cultivated Hezbollah as an alternative to Amal because Amal rejected strict obedience to Khomeini. The resulting Iranian and Syrian networks eventually cooperated through the Amal–Hezbollah alliance, despite their different origins.

Political cooperation also created direct contacts between Amal and Iran’s ruling regime. In September 2024, Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi met Amal representatives in Tehran and received a message from Berri. Iran’s state media praised Amal fighters for serving alongside Hezbollah against Israel. That meeting showed Iran’s interest in coordinating with Amal as well as Hezbollah during the fighting, while Berri continued to lead Amal as a separate movement.

Attacks and operations

Amal’s armed history includes civil war fighting, attacks on refugee camps and clashes with Hezbollah. During the War of the Camps, its Syrian-backed forces fought Fatah and inflicted severe losses on Arab civilians. Its commanders also became targets of Israeli operations. In 1994, Israeli officer Emmanuel Moreno took part in Operation Poisonous Sting, which captured Amal commander Mustafa Dirani at his home in Lebanon.

Armed activity remained visible in domestic Lebanese politics decades after the civil war. Following the 2020 Beirut port explosion, anti-government protesters erected symbolic gallows for effigies of political leaders, including Nasrallah. On August 8, Hezbollah and Amal supporters burned the gallows. The port investigation then became a focus of confrontation between the allied movements and opponents of political interference in the judiciary.

On October 14, 2021, a demonstration by Amal and Hezbollah members demanding the removal of the judge leading the port investigation was followed by gunfire in Beirut. Three Amal members, three Hezbollah members and a passerby were killed; dozens of others, including passersby, were wounded. Armed Amal members appeared in the streets during the clashes. Judge Habib Mezher, affiliated with Amal, also tried to take over the investigation. The episode showed how the movements’ political campaign over the inquiry could coincide with lethal armed violence.

Amal fighters cooperated with Hezbollah against Israel during the Israel–Hezbollah conflict that began in 2023. Iran’s ruling regime publicly praised that cooperation in September 2024. Amal’s armed role remained visible afterward: on December 16, 2025, an Israeli drone strike near Sebline killed Hussain Samir Quteish, whom Amal identified as an operative. Quteish used the nom de guerre Malak, and Amal gave him an official funeral in his hometown of Aqnoun.

Designations and international status

Amal and Hezbollah must be distinguished in accounts of their legal and political status. Hezbollah is a terrorist organization; Amal is a separate movement with its own leader, parliamentary representatives and armed history. Their joint electoral lists, cabinet positions and operations against Israel do not make Amal a branch of Hezbollah. Amal’s origins in al-Sadr’s Lebanese Shia mobilization also differ from Hezbollah’s origins in Iran’s revolutionary intervention in 1982.

Amal participates openly in Lebanese state institutions through parliament, cabinet appointments and local councils. Berri’s position as speaker gives its leader a formal role in the Lebanese government even as Amal retains an armed network. Its alliance with Hezbollah has made the question of armed groups’ power within Lebanon a recurring issue in parliamentary bargaining and public protest.

Current status

Amal remains an influential Shia political organization and Hezbollah’s principal Lebanese electoral ally. The two opposed Jihad Azour, the presidential candidate supported by the Progressive Socialist Party in 2023. During formation of Lebanon’s next government, Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea opposed their demand to retain the Finance Ministry. A full government was formed on February 8, 2025, and Amal gained five cabinet seats.

Amal’s present position combines institutional power, municipal reach and continued armed activity. Berri remains its leader and parliament’s speaker. Joint electoral organization with Hezbollah has given the alliance strong representation in Shia areas, while the 2024 fighting and the death of an Amal operative in 2025 demonstrated that Amal’s military role had not disappeared. Its separate history, leadership and Syrian alignment remain essential to understanding its partnership with the Iran-backed Hezbollah terrorist organization.

المراجع

  1. 1Iran rallies proxy groups and allies to vote against Israel ahead of UN speechfdd.org
  2. 2Hezbollah: History & Overviewjewishvirtuallibrary.org
  3. 3The Evolution of Iran’s Qods Force Since 1979washingtoninstitute.org
  4. 4Syria and the Polarization of Lebanese Politicswashingtoninstitute.org
  5. 5A Tale of Two Countries: Defining Post-Syria Lebanonwashingtoninstitute.org
  6. 6Israeli operations in Lebanon against Hezbollah: December 15–21, 2025fdd.org
  7. 7Hezbollah Faces Domestic Challenges with Self-Confidenceinss.org.il
  8. 8Reports on Religious Freedom: Lebanon 2023jewishvirtuallibrary.org
  9. 9Teaching Antisemitism and Terrorism in Hezbollah Schoolsadl.org
  10. 10Setting the Record Straight on Hezbollah Terrorist Leader Hassan Nasrallahajc.org
  11. 11France Must Put an End to the Fiction of a “Political Hezbollah”ajc.org
  12. 12Hezbollah Turns 40: Implications of the Group’s Internal, Regional, and Strategic Shiftswashingtoninstitute.org
  13. 13A who’s who of the groups involved in Beirut violence that left 7 deadtimesofisrael.com
  14. 14Arming Hizballah? U.S. Military Assistance to Lebanonwashingtoninstitute.org
  15. 15'We're at war with our government': Protesters briefly storm Beirut ministriestimesofisrael.com
  16. 16Beacon of Hatredwashingtoninstitute.org

الموضوعات الواقعة خارج نطاق الشرق الأوسط تحيل إلى Encyclopaedia Britannica.